Cases cannot be forecast
Pending work sits in scattered files and spreadsheets that no one can roll up into a real forecast.
← All solutions
Solutions · Client & Case Operations
One operating recordfor work spread across every inbox.
Work in wealth management, legal, insurance, healthcare administration, accounting, and other complex professional services rarely lives in one place. It's split across inboxes, spreadsheets, conversations, and half a dozen systems that don't talk to each other. I build the case intelligence layer that gives all of it one operating record.
The problem
The work is real. The record of it isn't.
Every case moves forward, eventually. The problem is that no one can see it moving until someone stops to go find out.
Requests get buried
A new request arrives by email or phone and competes with everything else in someone's inbox for attention.
Next actions are implicit
Everyone generally knows what needs to happen next, but nothing states it, assigns it, or tracks whether it happened.
Deadlines depend on memory
Statutory and client deadlines live in someone's head or a personal calendar, not in the system of record.
Ownership is fragmented
Multiple employees each hold a piece of the same case, with no single view of the whole thing.
Status reporting is manual
Producing a status update means someone stopping their real work to reconstruct where a case actually stands.
Clients ask, and the team reconstructs
Every client status request forces someone to piece together the answer from memory and scattered files.
How I solve it
Every case gets one tracked record.
I build a case intelligence layer connecting requests, documents, communications, owners, deadlines, dependencies, approvals, and system state. One tracked record replaces a trail scattered across inboxes and spreadsheets.
- Structured case intake
- Automatic case creation
- Case state tracking
- Owner assignment
- SLA logic
- Stalled-work detection
- Inbox extraction
- Document association
- Automated status updates
- Approval routing
- Client status reporting
- Historical case memory
- Workload forecasting
- Exception detection
Where this goes
The record becomes institutional memory.
Once cases are tracked in one place, the same record usually becomes something bigger: institutional memory for the whole practice. That's typically where this expands next, a broader service-delivery layer that remembers every case that came before the one in front of you, not just the one in front of you.
FAQ
Before you book.
Do I need to replace my case management system for this?
No. I connect to whatever you are running now, CRM, practice management software, or a set of shared spreadsheets, and layer structured tracking on top of it.
How long does this take to stand up?
A structured intake and state-tracking system for one case type can be live in a matter of weeks. Layering in SLA logic, document association, and client status reporting across every case type takes longer, and depends on how many systems are involved.
What does this cost?
It is priced to the scope, not a rate card. Tracking one case type is a narrower engagement than building the full case intelligence layer across a whole practice. I will give you a number once I understand what you are actually running.